Skip to content
Lavina Jahorina

lavina-jahorina.com

Lavina Jahorina

lavina-jahorina.com

New York files civil rights lawsuit against Harvey Weinstein, his company and his brother

Toby Lambert, February 12, 2018

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed suit on Sunday in New York County Supreme Court against Harvey Weinstein and his company, alleging that “The Weinstein Company repeatedly broke New York law by failing to protect its employees from pervasive sexual harassment, intimidation, and discrimination.” The complaint also names Harvey Weinstein’s brother, Robert.

The suit throws a wrench into the planned sale of The Weinstein Company to Maria Contreras-Sweet for $500 million.

Weinstein’s misdeeds were first exposed this fall in bombshell reports by the New York Times and the New Yorker. Schneiderman says the suit, the product of a four month investigation, contains “new and egregious examples of sexual misconduct by Harvey Weinstein.

The purpose of the suit is to ensure “victims will be compensated, employees will be protected going forward, and that neither perpetrators nor enablers will be unjustly enriched” by any sale of the company.

The complaint focuses in particular on Weinstein’s treatment on his own staff. Some examples:

HW told a male assistant he was fired for – as reflected in an email sent by the assistant to the head of Human Resources about the incident – being “just a fucking faggot boy, a stupid fucking faggot boy.” HW routinely used similar epithets attacking employees’ masculinity.

[Weinstein] asked female employees if they had their period, including asking an employee if her tampon was “up too far.” He also accused female employees of
wanting special treatment because of their gender.

HW told several employees throughout the relevant time period that, in substance,
“I will kill you,” “I will kill your family,” and “You don’t know what I can do,” or words to that effect. HW touted his connection to powerful political figures and asserted that he had contacts within the Secret Service that could take care of problems. Female employees knew from observations of HW and from the experiences of other TWC employees that he was capable of fits of rage, including infliction of physical injury, and that he was sexually aggressive. Thus, they became fearful that they could suffer physical injury or worse if they did not satisfy his demands.

One TWC employee was tasked with preparing a room in TWC’s offices for HW’s sexual activity when he wished to have sexual encounters in the office, and with cleaning up when it was over. Articles of women’s clothing were left behind on occasion after these incidents, making clear what transpired during these encounters and requiring TWC employees to make arrangements for their return.

The lawsuit also contains examples on Weinstein’s famously lecherous behavior, which also targeted women in the company.

According to information provided to TWC employees interviewed by the OAG, in one instance in late 2014, HW approached a young female TWC intern, and told her to write
her name and phone number on a slip of paper. The intern, who had not had interactions with HW before, was surprised and complied. HW asked her to join him for dinner that night but she declined, citing pre-existing plans. He told her to cancel them and that he would call her that night. When HW called, the employee again refused to meet him, and he ultimately proposed a meeting at 7:30a.m. at the Peninsula Hotel where he was staying. When she arrived at the hotel, HW made clear that he wanted a sexual relationship and proceeded to name famous actresses whose careers he purportedly had advanced after they agreed to his proposition. HW proposed a similar quid pro quo relationship to the intern. The intern spent an hour repeatedly saying no to his entreaties and refusing to come up to HW’s hotel room. After the incident, the intern left the company. The complaint was reported to Human Resources and to company executives, but TWC took no institutional action to protect interns from HW or prevent future recurrence of such conduct.

The lawsuit seeks substantial civil fines ($100,000 to $250,000) for each violation of New York’s civil right law. The state also seeks “restitution and damages in the amount of the harm to the victims of Respondents’ illegal conduct in connection with its hostile workplace environment and sexual harassment of women.”

A separate class action lawsuit was filed in November.


Politics

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Categories

Archives

Recent Posts

  • White Casual Jackets for Men’s

  • Lavina Jahorina: Top 10 Best Weighted Blankets For Adults Comparison

  • Black Work Jackets for Men

  • Itaar Infant Canvas Sneaker Shoes

  • Raiders Bomber Jacket Men

  • Top 10 Best Shimano Symetre Spinning Fishing Reel Comparison

  • Columbia Outdry Down Jacket Mens

  • Denim Jackets for Men With Hood

  • Top 10 Best What Is Trivets Used For Comparison

  • Sport Suits Mens

  • Is It Cheaper to Rent or Buy a Suit?

  • Top 10 Best Men’s Wool Bomber Jacket Comparison

  • What Is Morning Suit at a Wedding?

  • Patagonia Down Jackets Men

  • Top 10 Best Trivet Display Comparison

  • Top 10 Best Antique Silver Trivet Comparison

  • Top 10 Best Trivets Rice Cooker Comparison

  • Men Wool-blend Shawl Cardigan Sweaters

  • New ‘text bomb’ bug causes Apple devices to crash

  • Top 10 Best What Is Trilene Fishing Line? Comparison

  • Nike Retro Bomber Jacket

  • Black Mens Jackets

  • Jean Jackets Men’s Outfits

  • CDL sells a hundred and fifty units at start of Whistler Grand condominium in West Coast

  • Top 10 Best Fishing Reels Full Metal Body Comparison

  • Top 10 Best Yoshikawa Fishing Reels Comparison

  • Some Things You Must Consider When You Want to Buy Facebook Likes

  • Top 10 Best Titanium Fishing Reels Comparison

  • Top 10 Best Uglystik Gx2 Spinning Fishing Reel And Rod Comb Comparison

  • Top 10 Best Fishing Reel Grip Cover Comparison

©2025 Lavina Jahorina | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes